The Human Computer

America is a polyglot no doubt, but do not find yourself fooled by it's superficial diversity for just beneath the surface lies the machinery of unified hegemony.

Prologue

Who are we? Why do we live? What is the purpose of this life? These are the big questions, and the answers to them are so simple they are overlooked everyday. We cannot accept that we once lived in full understanding of our purpose in life. We lived that way for very nearly 300,000 years. We knew who we were in relation to the earth, and why we lived: We lived because our lives showed us meaning. Nature gave us endless lessons and we never stopped learning.

Then into the garden a serpent did come. Domestication of other animals, large scale agriculture, and of course civilization. These things slithered gradually into our lives bringing us new wonders with every passing century. In a relatively short span of time we forgot the lessons of 300,000 years of balance. We came to see nature as an enemy rather than the force which spawned us. We created god's to replace her, to strip her of her power in our minds. We became controlled by our creations. Then men came to power who could hold our creations in our mouth, as a bit to a horse, and guide us with them. We became slaves, we lost our freedom, we gave up the last sacred force of the former beast which we were biologically still are.

Here we find our species now unable to fend for ourselves without the hand of our institutions. The squirrel gathers his food in his season, survives the bitter force of winter, and begins all over again to mate in spring. So it was with free mankind for almost all of his history. Yet that simple life and death cycle seems completely foreign to us even though the pathogen to be is not nature. It is civilization itself. In the brief body of this text you will come to see this assertion as a truism, as an absolute fact of our human condition. Civilization as we must have it, due to our unchangeable nature, is our achilles heel. It will be the end of us if we do not find the courage to dissent and destroy it. 

Part One

Chapter One

Let it be said that sometimes in order to serve one's country one must stand as an enemy against it. Criminals and vagrants, murderers and thieves, assassins and deserters, grifters and drifters, and all outcast men.  Men scrounging in the shadows to survive in the so called light of civilization. This work is your mantra, your purpose, your justification, your vindication, and in the end under natural law, the destruction of the worst of you. The lie of civilization shall be exposed bare. Human nature held for once without the veil, the shroud of propaganda, the lies. Then man shall stand once again free never to descend into the pitfall called society again.

The latest science tells us we have walked the earth as homo sapien for at least 300,000 years. Most of this history is unknown to us. However the few of us who have lived for many years, close to the earth, off of the land, have the privilege of knowing more. We can feel what early man felt, we can sympathize with his daily struggle, and we can do it with knowledge and perspective given to us through hindsight. Nature is our system, because in the end it succeeds in the destruction of each of us. Society, civilization, are that which slaveholders and overseers, corrupt government officials, corporate cronies, and such use to control and convince mankind that he is better off being lead. They desire to convince him that he cannot take care of himself. They force mankind to forget that he can live as the beasts which are not "less" than him. Rather they are his brethren with whom he lived with in balance for more than 290,000 years.

Would we eat our brethren you may ask, or would our brethren eat us? Yet society teaches us to eat or be eaten at every level. However only eat according to the rules, or be above the rules altogether and eat to your fill. In a state of nature only those with the necessary traits survive to eat or be eaten. In the end all are eaten by the earth upon which we stand. Nature is indifferent, and has a perfect record throughout all time. Perfection through survival of the fittest and natural selection. We cannot achieve such perfection through our social experiment called civilization. We have 5,000 to 10,000 years of chaos in one hand and 290,000 years of balance with nature in the other. The evidence is irrefutable. We must throw off the shackles of the prison we are living in. We must re-learn our old ways. We must put aside the fear of those things which really are closest to our natural selves.

Back to my fallen brethren of which I am also a member. To the social deviants, the square pegs being squeezed into round holes, the outlaws. You are merely those who still play by the free and open laws of nature. You do not understand man's law because man's law was not written for the dominant homo sapien. It was written to control the weak minded or fearfully manipulated members of our number into denying their nature in exchange for food and protection. As man first wooed the wolves from the pack to the cave for food and then turned him into the docile obedient dog, so our "leaders" do lure us to the cave called society to do the same to us.
We can no longer be our true selves. We must acquiesce to our overseers as slaves of the industrial machine of society. We must accept that we are what we do and nothing more. Yet history teaches us we are so much more.

Before industrialized society, in the pre and post civil war era 19th century for example, during the brief period of western expansion on thru reconstruction not so long ago... men and woman were so much more than the homo sapien of today. Even then, so close in time to our own era, human beings, each and every healthy one and even many sick ones, could make war, build a home, grow food, hunt and forage, make weapons, live through intense daily pain and struggle, and if nature favored their DNA even conquer disease without the help of modern medicine. They could travel by the stars at night, and the sun by day. They stood up against every disrespect regardless of social stature. From the President of the United States, to the vagrant fur trapper, conflict was resolved by the most ancient of laws. If you disrespect me or mine, we either fight to resolve it, or duel to the death. Now strong men and women must cower to every disrespect, or handle it in the shadows, for society favors the weak over the strong... but never the strong over the weak regardless of who is truly in the wrong. This is because true strength is viewed as cave-man like savagery as left over darkness from an archaic past. It is a statement of individual power independent from the system. This is the lie we are fed from birth. When in fact such savagery is why we still exist. Without it we would have never survived 300,000 years. The savagery of society however in the past 10,000 years could never be eclipsed by the the number of violent deeds of men for all of prehistory. In brief, society has killed and continues to kill, has enslaved and continues to enslave, more human beings and animals over the past 5,000 to 10,000 years than all mankind had done in 290,000 years before it combined. As such, society itself poses the greatest of all threats to the survival of our species and all others. We must shatter its institutions. We must break down its walls. We must stamp out its resonant supporters. This alone can stop the freight train of mankind from running full speed off of the cliff of extinction, down into the graveyard of history, forgotten.

Society has always had another central problem. At the core it is always seeking out more resources, to gather them it must create more individuals, then more resources must be gathered for those individuals, then more individuals for more resources, and the cycle continues until the lack of resources becomes so out of balance with the number of individuals that said society collapses. So it was with the Sumerians, the Hittites, the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Persians, the Macedonians, the Romans, The English Empire, The Spanish Empire, The French Empire, The Russian Empire, and finally the United States.

The problem has become so ingrained in our social consciousness that we cannot escape it. We must destroy ourselves. It is in our nature to fight amongst ourselves, and we can only think in terms of limited resources. Society reinforces these behaviors because it is what keeps things "in order," and it aligns well with our genetic nature.

Which brings us to the elephant in the room: Technology. Is all technology, the gift of society, inherently evil? If said technology requires only infinite renewable resources upon which to run then no, otherwise yes. Sustainably run  technology is the only true form of technology because any other form of technology is tantamount to the very first flames which burned out in our cave thousands of years ago. That is what it all breaks down to. Unsustainable technology is self-defeating and in and of itself a lie. Why? Because unsustainable technology is mutually exclusive in combination with its unsustainable source so that when the source, the energy, of that said technology is evaporated the technology becomes like the antiquated machinery of ancient pompeii forever frozen, encrusted, never to be used again. Such is the case with all things we depend upon. We still burn fires to fuel our lives, fires to feed our avarice, and we will, as the Romans before us, run out of "lumber." This time however, amongst the burning embers, nothingness will be all that remains of the earth.

We have established a few major assertions thus far. Men can live better lives as free as the beasts, and only need maintain technology that runs on renewable resources. Men must not continue to build and build larger numbers of themselves in an endless quest for resources, but rather must procreate in balance with other species, and give his collective life over to the laws of death and nature in general. In short billions less people, renewable technology, closeness and balance with the earth will save us. Not a doctrine non-violence, not a subversion of freedom, but living with his/her nature good or bad under natural law. Violence happens now and in all societal history at levels unheard of when man lived amongst nature. We must move back in order to live in balance, which is better than any step foreword society can offer. Society is the dead end of mankind. Again it stands to be repeated: Small numbers of homo sapiens living within a state of nature utilizing renewable technology are the only hope we have. Embrace the power of dissent; the necessity of dissent. 

Part One

Chapter Two

I live amongst the beasts in cages. I hide amongst them. If they see me they can do as they please, for if I rise against them it is I who will pay.  I will maintain my power, and my dignity, but I may lose my freedom. Therefore I must live in the shadows. Like those in the forgotten train yards of Fahrenheit 451, in the abandoned outskirts of society I must reside. I must walk into society as a chameleon and blend with the caged monkeys. And it is here that I find a certain truth. I am free, walking through the biggest prison yard ever constructed hoping every second not to get imprisoned myself. This is society to the free man.

Really it is a very logical thing. Ask anyone can man live without government? The answer is always something like: "Government is a necessary evil." Sometimes a really progressive human will say something smart like: "We already tried that and it didn't work." The thing is no evil as great as government is ever necessary, and we did live without government for 300,000 years successfully. Then we lived with some form of government or another for 5,000 to 10,000 years, and every form of it has failed, and lead us ever closer to the end of life as we know it. Think about that fact: Every other form of government in our history has failed, and you think this one will succeed? Every civilization has collapsed, but not this one, right? The core issue is that the end of this one may very well be the end of everything, and I cannot let that happen. We cannot let that happen. We all have to drop out. Stop buying in. Quit. Stop participating. That is the necessity of dissent in action. Then if others do not follow, or challenge us with violence, we must meet that violence. We must revolt with the code of carrying it to the bitter end, to life's last breath. We must be more cruel than the cruelest, stronger than the strongest, and when we cannot we must be more cunning than our enemies in every way. We must use every form of dissent in histories arsenal until our systems and civilizations crumble.
Then we will begin again as we were in prehistory: free.

True liberty, imagine it. Then think about why deep down you crave it. It is because you are biologically the same as your ancestors who lived before civilization. They lived free for untold millennia, and so can you. Even one day lived in that state of being will bring more reward to you than a lifetime of this system. You know your life is empty, and meaningless. What you do not know is you have the power to change that. Put away your fear of death. Accept life as it is. Live by the natural code of life. Therein you will find the meaning you are searching for. Life's meaning is the same for every one of our number, and for every beast. We want freedom, and the chance to survive on our own will. Are you up to the challenge, or will you live by the code of fear implanted in your brain by your slaveholders?

Let us talk frankly in terms of facts and numbers for a bit shall we? The fact is human nature, both good and bad, is well established in its given evolutionary stage. Since the great leap to civilization only about 10,000 years have passed at the most, perhaps only 5,000. Our earliest homo sapiens, nearly evolutionarily equals to us, lived as much as 290,000 years before this or even more. Save possibly a few genetically undetectable adaptations (ie. hot and cold tolerances, bacterial resistance, heightened sensory perception.) we are one and the same with our earliest known ancestors.

Today most of our foremost thinkers, from Stephen Hawking, to Elon Musk, to Neil Degrasse Tyson, collectively agree man must expand to other worlds or die. The basic logic behind this is that man cannot evolve in time to save himself so he must take his screwed up nature and expand to other places. My assertion is similar in that man cannot evolve in time, but he should not expand as a result of his inability to evolve, but rather he should contract. He cannot change his nature. My thesis is, based on all the available facts, mankind will not be able to leave the earth before a major societal collapse or worse: Extinction... in part or in total terms. We must shrink our populations by the force of the masses, or by societal collapse as a result of our actions of dissent. We must get our numbers down globally. We must concentrate ourselves in small groups running on wind and solar power. We must grow organic food in small intentional community greenhouses and fields. We must control our population growth through a combination of contraception, minimal medical intervention, and acceptance of the life cycle of birth to death. We must trust evolution and the natural process. Society was created as a grand system with one two-fold goal: conquer nature, conquer death. However we need nature and death or life would eventually lose all meaning for us. We would be robots and no longer beasts and men. We would lose all interest in sex, in food, in the fight for survival if we were as gods. If there is a god or gods they must envy mankind. With our deeply meaningful lives which can end and will end... and forever they must live without purpose other than to see us in all our glorious pleasure, pain, and strife only knowing that death is always there as our constant shadow. We have everything as we live, (if we truly live) and in death it can be said we had everything. The gods have nothing, and even if they exist and were once mortal, they have long forgotten the feeling of standing under a warm sun. They are eternal algorithms completely out of touch with meaning. They are dead, even if they "exist." For to exist is not the same as to live. Living has substance, existence has emptiness. This is why you who serve this system always feel empty, and as such are always trying to fill your cup. It is because only a life lived in attempted acceptance and balance with nature itself holds any substance. As long as you fill your life with consumption for consumption's sake, you will remain dead inside. In nature we consume to live, in society you live to consume. In the macro-world that kind of societal norm will eat up every resource on earth until society consumes itself. Until the earth is sucked dry. Until the inner emptiness within each of us becomes everything and nothing, that which remains.... a dead planet.

Part One 

Chapter Three

Monoculture. This is not just what created the "breadbasket" of the world. Not solely the "greatest agricultural achievement" of mankind. It turned food into commodities. Corn, wheat, soy.., plants with millions of years of evolutionary history, into stocks and bonds. Plants into controlled slaves. It created mass food, for mass consumption, for mass breeding, for mass industry... and more consumption. It created the dust bowl. It resulted in destruction of wheat for profit while farmers starved eating dust in Oklahoma. The idea being infinite wealth creation and infinite food creation could be controlled thru market manipulation and not so "natural" disasters. The thinking being the issue of overpopulation could always be answered by destroying some commodities or ignoring environmental hazards and their potential consequences.

At the same time of the development of monoculture came the World Wars which skyrocketed consumption, profit, and population control for added benefit. These also opened the pandora's box of warfare, the Manhattan project. Mass destruction at a level never seen before was now possible. The kind of destructive capacity able to kill as many people in a single day as Hitler did in all of the second world war combined had now become a reality. Listen to the stories of the rare survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, they will pale against all others you have ever heard. People were said to be jumping into rivers of fire to put out the flames upon themselves. A child told of how her mother had a single gold tooth, and upon searching and finding her they found only a pillar of ash. Within it the face of a person and a single gold tooth. As they watched the ash blew away as dust in the wind, and the tooth fell to the ground. Their mother reduced to nothing. It was as the mythological tale of Sodom and Gomorrah. It was Biblical. Such is the product of our so-called civilization: The grass of the field knoweth not of war, though it be stained by the blood of men.

These wars could have never happened at such scale, such technology never conceived of, if not for the masses and technology created by monoculture. The exponential growth curve of population needed new solutions for those in power. In this case, as in all cases relating to unsustainable technology and social ills, the solution became a new problem. We could now end all life on earth, and we were still, biologically speaking as we are now, essentially “cave men.”

Monoculture has other meaning as well. The real goal of all of this was to turn all of mankind into a monoculture commodity. Each human being was to become a controlled unit, slight variances to be tolerated to give the image of diversity and freedom of course, marching in total uniformity of overall purpose and hegemony. Each a follower, thinking him/herself a leader or individual, all the while being lead by the same subconscious propaganda machine that was the twentieth, and now twenty-first century. We in the industrialized world are now corporate controlled monoculture. Beings with an amazing history of individual feats and accomplishments reduced to slaves. Three hundred thousand years of freedom given up for civilization... for blu ray, fast food, fox news, cnn, you name it. All so we march along to a doom that those at the top know, more than anyone, is inevitable short of societal collapse. Do not listen to the recommendations of the earth's foremost scientists, listen to what they say will happen if we do not make certain massive changes. Then look, objectively, at the changes themselves and ask yourself if there is anyway we will implement those changes. When you get your answer you will know the truth. The time for packing a tent and a knife into the woods, along with a survival book, is at hand. Drop out, or we drop off the face of the earth forever.

The next major monoculture crisis is history doomed to repeat itself. Monoculture itself is creating a new dust bowl in waiting among countless other unnamed catastrophes. Corn uses more of the plains aquifer of Oklahoma than wheat ever did according to recent statistics. For this and the soil destruction re-occurring we have no solution. Just keep growing more corn they say. Keep marching off the cliff, because they still think killing a few will save the many. The truth is we are growing too fast for antiquated solutions to work. The world's first major civilization Sumer, the Sumerians as they are known, found out what happens when soil gets destroyed. At some level the destruction can last essentially forever when it passes a breaking point. Now the middle east is a desert where plush farmland once flourished. Our western plains are headed directly toward that same fate.

You don't have to go far to see why monoculture is the end of all things in and of itself. Just look at the diversity in your closest woodland area. Diversity creates balance and a perfect playground for survival of the fittest and natural selection, in a word: competition. Monoculture destroys this natural world which has been operating successfully, through extinctions major and minor, asteroid impacts, ice ages, et cetera for billions of years. We think that one hundred years of monoculture, with its many created disasters such as the dust bowl, destruction and extinction of entire ecosystems millions of years old, the death of our bee populations upon which we depend for survival, is still the answer. We need to plow down those fields and rejuvenate the soil with organic matter. Then we need to back away and let nature take over and heal the earth. "For nature," it has been said by Aristotle and many since have quoted, "abhors a vacuum." It will fill our destruction with life, for it is a self healing organism with billions of years of experience and credentials written in stone proving it can. We need to get the Hell out of the way. Then those of our number who remain must find a place of eternal balance with all things. We must take a "great leap" back in order to save our planet, and perhaps ourselves.

Part One

Chapter Four

Game Theory. John Nash. "A beautiful mind," but also "A schizophrenic mind." The wizard behind the veil, the wonderful wizard of our Oz, was certifiable. Now all this I say not to knock his brilliance, for in a certain sense all of us are certifiable. I say this because the schizophrenic mind is a paranoid mind given to delusions. It does not merely affect mood, or socialization, or health as in the case of manic depression for example. Schizophrenia affects perception of the real world in terms of one's actual physical perception. One actually can perceive things that do not exist. In the case of Mr. Nash create people, interact with them, touch them, even though they are not there. Out of this mind came a system rooted in paranoia. It all boiled down to a system where love and familial bonding, even the family unit, was to be replaced with measurable things like competition. A world, not unlike the world of the Nash, where no one and nothing could be trusted. A place where self preservation would take a central role over bonding and the better angels of our nature. This new system was perfect for controlling the masses and as such was adopted and rolled into our social systems. It was calculated by cold war era sociologists, anthropologists, and those in power that a setting of false competition would boil human decision making down to a series of potential algorithms. As such human behavior could now be essentially predicted, and then of course controlled. For if you controlled the institutions, the propaganda, everything that a person would experience, and you had mankind in a competitive mode exclusively, you could control who each person would or would not become. The other side of our nature essentially denied, or deemed rare heroism or criminality, was to be scraped for the overall social model. It was too unpredictable, it could not be controlled. Nature built us that way because it was better for the survival of the small group and individual. Society does everything to destroy it for the opposite reason. The other side of our nature works against the machine, against the destructive force called civilization. It must not be destroyed. It is a part of each of us.

Essentially opportunists as "they" are, the men in power did make us all "insane" in order to control us. They split our nature in half creating a cognitive dissonance resonating within each of us and our collective mind. We still yearn for love and unity. Therefore we live in a state a predictable angst fueling our incessant need to compete and consume. Like the lesser apes in a group, denied love and food, we fight pointlessly and predictably for scraps until our bitter end never turning on the so-called alpha male. In this case never turning on the makers of society which have taken our individual means away. Those who refuse, or cannot assimilate, are either on the streets, dead, or in prison generally speaking. Those who are the weakest interns of absolute manipulability generally become the most successful do to their bendable minds. This is not an acceptable state of being for the human species.

We are not meant to live in large groups. Our strong minded are not meant to be controlled. Our nature is not meant to be divided. And even if such a system could "succeed" for millions of years, which it cannot for even a few hundred more years, it would create two levels of evolved humans. Masters and slaves. Our masses, we, would faithfully serve a higher evolved class of human being without question for our disobedience would have been long since rooted out. We would be cattle, and if you really look you can already see the adaptations taking place in our society. But, as long as dissent exists, so does hope for our species. We must throw a wrench into the machine before we are churned into mindless meat. We must become our natural selves. We must become beasts: Beasts of war against the system.

This is a real war. It is a war of the mind, but also of the body. It will require its pound of flesh. Perhaps more than any other war in history. However lying in the ashes of this war may be a mankind ready to live as was intended by nature. Without this war we face certain extinction. Therefore sharpen your swords and hammer your cleavers, awaken your dark and free nature, and begin to drop out and prepare for war. Soil your faces with sweat and blood, and let us defeat our enemies together. Let it be said mankind saved itself, and its planet, from the brink. Let mankind be called a free species roaming the earth once more. No more masters, no more slaves, only free men and women on a quest to live free and then die. A quest to live life as it was intended to be lived by nature not by false gods and false promises.

Part One 

Chapter Five

Police State: Fahrenheit 451, 1984, The Hunger Games, etc. We are on the brink really of living in dystopia. Which in fact is why this type of literature, and film adaptations based upon them, have been so successful. I was sitting in a diner recently, a real old piece of Americana, when I had another level of personal awakening. Behind the bar were a myriad of various television screens depicting different forms of propaganda. It was like a stew of bullshit really. They all centered of course around the largest of which, which was showing a rather grim scene unfolding. Now for me my artistic mind began to silence out the crowded diner goers immediately and it was as if the lights had dimmed, and time had stopped, except for this one television. On it were three large, well muscled, white police officers surrounding an unarmed black man against the floor, near a wall, in an apartment living room. His elderly mother was watching silently. He was screaming at the armed group that they were trying to kill him as he was rolling around on the floor being handcuffed. After this obviously helpless, out gunned, unarmed man slipped out of the plastic cuff he continued to roll around screaming and crying. He did so making no untoward movements against the three large white men, he just rolled and cried. Then came three distinct and separate taser shots from each officer. The man screamed, "they are trying to kill me." He then rolled onto the bottom of a nearby sofa and then came three more taser shots. Then I turned to look around.

I saw a scene no different, clothing style aside, than that of the early the 1980s. Not one person was reacting they all just chewed and jabbered away. Unflinchingly. I was aghast at this lack of reaction. Then I remembered a scene in the dystopian film Brazil, where everyone is eating and continues to eat while a "terrorist" bomb goes off in a restaurant. It is amazing how quickly a nation can slip into total dictatorship, how they can ignore suffering even while eating in a diner, or walking down the street, or amongst even their closest friends or family. People blind themselves because in the first place they do not want to be associated in any way with dissent and become injured or get killed, secondly they convince themselves that it either isn't happening or that it is well deserved. They are often entertained and desensitized from such things. Not unlike the torturer's of the middle ages, man is the same brute. They feed the brute controlled violence, even let he/she act with violence within certain frameworks, but they keep the beast at bay.

If not a prison is always nearby. We have a nations worth of people in prison in fact. Even if a thousand U.S. inmates, carefully selected for lack of family and friends, (not hard to find in prison) were maliciously killed and buried without due process per month. The numbers rotating into prison are such that they would go unnoticed. A thousand human beings a week or more are going away into our prisons. This has happened and is happening in prisons in the United States. It is sad to say that kind of thing has to still be going on.

Truly though it is happening, Nazi things, terrible things, and you don't want to know. They don't want to tell you. Like a cheating husband and a wife who "knows," but doesn't really want to know. Don't bring her the film, or the evidence, and the illusion can live on. Well folks, welcome to America the greatest illusion ever created. Where you can believe everything is possible, as long as you keep your head down and do exactly as you are told. That is dictatorship under the veil of freedom. A veil of stars and stripes. The veil must be lifted.

You think we really have over 75 million rapists and murders that America is protecting us from? This self same government rewarded the Mai Lai massacre in Vietnam and Frank Wuterich in Iraq, while imprisoning Daniel 

Elsberg for the realease of the Pentagon Papers and Bradley (/Chelsea) Manning for releasing the truth to the so-called Free American. Well if we are free then why punish the whistleblowers? Why can't we hear the truth? If we are protected then why no trials for war crimes against our own troops? Germany did it, why not us? Are we less moral than the "Fatherland?" Tough questions? There are even tougher answers, but simple answers. Government and civilization create tyranny. Individuals used to be able to fight tyranny, but at this scale it is going to take the many, where as in the past it took the few who would later become the many. We need mankind to step up as one and fight, then step down his/her ecological impact thru population control, and sustainable technology. Reduced to small communities living within balance with nature we may destroy this type of so-called civilization permanently.

Hitler's Nazi Germany, Stalin's U.S.S.R, Mao's China, Ho Chi Minh's Vietnam, Pol Pot's Cambodia, Kim Jong Un's Korea, Franco's Spain, Mussolini's Italy, on and on we go "Rockefeller's America." Whatever you want to call it socialism, fascism, capitalism, it all works out to the same thing: A few men with power, the masses as slaves. Different illusions and propaganda, a rose by other names, but still sweet truth. America tells us freedom isn't free. Russia told it's people they served the great revolutionary ideals of Karl Marx. Hitler told his citizens they served the faithful Fatherland. Whatever the lie, only the truth  matters to you and to me. We are in fact in chains.  Our freedom and the fight to maintain it are mutually exclusive illusions. Each depends on the other to survive. It is a collective delusion as bad as any other, and it has killed far more people than the Khmer Rouge. (We even helped fund that little debacle by the way. However "indirectly" as it may seem we gave aid to China who, we knew of course, was then giving aid to Pol Pot. We killed Ché Guevara in Bolivia. We ousted Salvador Allende in Chile even though the people elected him. The CIA placed Pinochet into power, and gave him material support. We do this because we like to do these types of things. We like to speak with a public face of freedom to the world while subjugating the very thing that is liberty against tyranny. We are that tyranny).

Speaking of which, at least three major genocides occurred during my childhood of E.T. and Back to the Future. During my teen years of Fresh Prince of Bel Air. There was the one in Bosnia/Serbia. The one in the Congo, and the one in Rwanda. There was one more major one attempted in Afghanistan that we stopped by giving support to the Mujahideen, who later became "Al Qaeda" "Hodge" our victim of occupation and genocide along with nearly all of the Islamic middle east. Ironic? Well not really if you know your history. We helped create the Vietnim in Vietnam just to kick the French out, then we slid in between China and Russia to kill our former allies (now the Vietcong) for what became the first major war lost in U.S. History. But if you ask the folks in oil and arms if we lost in Vietnam, they'll tell you they posted record profits just like they do in our current wars. They think we won.

Something else was going on in the world during the 1980s and 1990s "TGIF" life in America. While Russian children ate carpenters glue to curb hunger, while Cuban sanctions produced it's "special period" of starvation, while South Africa was enduring apartheid we supported the apartheid government. At the same time Fidel Castro sent an army of half starved soldiers to help end apartheid. Nelson Mandela and Fidel Castro remained close friends after this until they died. Still think we are a successful nation? Is blindness to millions of starving masses success to you? Is aiding criminal governments, even worse than our own a winning situation? How can history look favorably upon such a nation such as this? The fact is tyranny is everywhere, all the time, and we always have some kind of hand in it through action or inaction, directly or indirectly, secretly or in full view, for all "the blind" to see.
Civilizations best attempt at success is a long train to nowhere. A complete failure and illusion.

What follows after revolution? The answer is Evolution. Revolution must now be followed by the natural system of evolution. The following are a few of quotes by one of my favorite authors, Edward Abbey that fit well here:

"The tank, the B-52, the fighter-bomber, the state-controlled police and military are the weapons of dictatorship. The rifle is the weapon of democracy. Not for nothing was the revolver called an "equalizer." Egalite implies liberte. And always will. Let us hope our weapons are never needed — but do not forget what the common people of this nation knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny."

"Anarchism is not a romantic fable but the hardheaded realization, based on five thousand years of experience, that we cannot entrust the management of our lives to kings, priests, politicians, generals, and county commissioners."

"My loyalties will not be bound by national borders, or confined in time by one nation's history, or limited in the spiritual dimension by one language and culture. I pledge my allegiance to the damned human race, and my everlasting love to the green hills of Earth, and my intimations of glory to the singing stars to the very end of space and time."

Edward Abbey Folks, summed it up pretty good there I think:

Revolution followed by Evolution. In this case evolution into what many call anarchy the pure and never failing natural laws and state of nature. The system that spawned us, and protected us for 300,000 years. The system we will otherwise destroy.

The state of nature is freedom pure. Freedom to fight, to try to survive, to live as you please. It asks no higher moral code that would take any species millions of years to develop, but only requires us to live in the natural balance created by living under the natural system of life and death. It has never failed completely, like every civilization in our history. It has no tyranny only indifference, which is hard but fair: True and equal, and devastating as is all mortal life, but it is worth repeating: Nature, by indifference, is fair. All are subject to natural selection and survival of the fittest. All live with death as a constant companion. All wish to live free who deserve to live. All others are already dead inside.

We must learn that every-time we have tried to fight against nature we have either outright or eventually lost, or we have succeeded in creating something destructive to nature thus losing by endangering our planet and ourselves. We must understand why other species have survived for millions of years and we only for about 300,000 years before jeopardizing everything. Other species do not ask why, they do not question the natural worlds laws, they live by them. Many of them experience love, loss, revenge, pain, hatred yet they continue to live as beasts. Science has shown all of these emotions and more in many animal populations. They have found that many species have intelligence levels nearly equal, or perhaps superior, to our own. It may be true they do not harbor certain capacities that we have, but what remains certainly true are these inexorable facts: The animal kingdom, all of nature save humanity, has lived for essentially eternity without threatening to destroy the earth itself, nor by their own actions knowingly walked the path toward their own extinction, and willingly at that, as we are doing in both cases. Nor did we for the 290,000 years or so before we built civilization. Therefore the only problem that could be causing this is not our nature, but our creation called society. This is perfect logic. The only thing that has changed is our continually chosen mistake to try to live in civilization. It has been oft said the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result. Yet we have been doing it for five to ten thousand years over and over again. Build a society, outgrow it, watch it collapse for essentially the same reasons. All the while nature has been living as before only harmed in any possibly permanent way by our own actions. Let us take a lesson from the system that spawned us, and not dismiss it as arrogant children. Nature works, and it is crying out for us to work with it.

Title of Part Two: 

The Epoch of Ignorance 

Chapter One

Institutionalization

Life. Deep, endless, vast, divergent, evolving. An organism, a single cell, a universe - a multiverse - division and singularity- Darkness and light. Life is the ultimate. Life is paradox. Yet it makes sense unto itself.

I set out to discover the mystery of life. I gave myself over to its lessons. I saw only closed doors, glimpses of light on the walls of my cave, boxes and more boxes. Society took shape before my eyes. Control, manipulation, fear, insecurity, all of it’s arsenal revealed. Its queen's gambit apparent as a child's first ruse upon his/her mother or father. Elementary, basic, yet in the moment that it slips by overlooked, potentially deadly. It gets us in our innate vulnerability. It infects our minds as a parasite before we have formed our own thinking apparatus.  We like those of a cult are drugged by the words of our leaders. Television, the internet, the newspapers and blogs, the books, the films, essentially all we have come to experience is propaganda. Our minds cannot distinguish truth from fiction because we have only known lies from the beginning.

It begins while we are still in the womb.  Our parents conceive us. They, both infected with the disease of society, pass it on to us like a genetic abnormality. This is why when we first arrive it takes four to five years of conditioning to get us well behaved enough to submit to institutionalization. Then another twelve years of conditioning are required to get us institutionalized enough to participate in civilization itself. That's just the minimum. This says nothing of the countless millions who fail this process and become Untouchables. For this is all a subversion of our natural will, a pious attempt to control it at that.

The corporations sell our parents endless heaps of crap to prepare for our arrival. A thing that happens on its own with a certain degree of inevitability. A doe, for example, releases the fawn from her womb. A lick hear, a nudge there, and oft to find a suitable pastoral land upon which to graze and bring back healthy milk. The fawn spends its beginning sleeping hidden in tall weeds alone waiting for mother to arrive and give sustenance.

Yet we are told we need hospitals, drugs, epidurals, anything to block out the reality of birth and of life. Most essentially to erase the ever present awareness of life's "ruthless sibling" Death. Then they start from birth by inoculating us, or rather killing us. They wash off the embryonic fluid and remains of placenta, which pass bacterial resistance from mother to child. They then kill everything living in our food, in our bodies, they push life out. This is, of course, for good reason in the minds of the doctors. Life wants to kill us, or at least it can if we are biologically weak or just in the wrong place at the wrong time and ill equipped to adapt to what life has thrown our way. They, we, push life away because of this hard fact.

However as a result we have lost our sense of ourselves. We are out of balance with our own nature and our planet. We have lost our place in the greater ecosystem. We have been blinded by fear of death as well founded as it may seem to be. Why live by a code of fear whose center of repute is inevitable? Fear must always be tempered with courage and pragmatism. Fear alone must be controlled and used with this in mind: Whatever is feared is either inevitable or out of our control, or can be defeated.  Thus rendering the emotion of fear to a useful notification, nothing more. Basically note that you are afraid and ask why? The answer will be either it is out of my control, it is unavoidable, or I can defeat this. Fear is how we are primarily controlled by society. Fear of death, of nature, of the unknown. We reach out to society for a false sense of security.

Under fear we must address control itself. Control, and the need to maintain it, have corrupted every society in the history of man. Our system is not immune from this fact. Now because of this we lack not only balance, but a reference point from which to find it in the first place. How can any being under such fear and control possibly find any internal or external balance? If our society itself is so controlled and systematically corrupted how do we find reality? Well power itself is not the same as reality. Though many will argue they are, for all intents and purposes, pragmatically equal. I will not. Reality for a Jewish person living under the Reich would be much different than reality for the Fürer himself on "The night of the long knife." Power may be very real in both cases, and yet devastatingly wrong. It cannot be given the title of reality, it must be destroyed by any means. Such is the case with our exponentially destructive system today. In the end such grave wrongs tip the balance in favor of those of us who can both see the wrongs and wish to right them. Those of us who must also possess the courage to act without fear of any form of retribution or consequence of action. Karma may not be something we can all agree upon, but we must agree that whatever spirit or core nature mankind possesses desires a kind of "balance of Karma" in favor of the right and of the good.  However suppressed that part of our nature may be by those in power it is still there alive and well within all human beings.

We all deep down wish for good to conquer evil if we are sane. Make no mistake we are living under great evil. The greatest evil mankind has ever had the opportunity to defeat. The embers of Auschwitz still burn. The ghosts of Bosnia/Serbia, Rwanda, and the Congo still tarry. We still live under the blindness of the Reichswehr. Such is our apparently cyclical fate. Round the merry go round of history we turn always stopping at the same places, always spinning always at the same pace. This time the machine will break down and destroy the world if we do not act. A real change must start at the most fundamental of levels, our minds.

We must first however discover what our mind unleashed truly is. It is, rather clearly I think, first and foremost a weapon. Which is why every attempt has been made to use it as such while keeping it constantly controlled. What other weapon can kill millions without lifting a finger? I tell you this truth Hitler did not kill six million Jews, the power of the human mind killed six million Jews. The bomb at Hiroshima, at its root the human mind. Stalin and Marxism killed millions right? No, again the human mind. The human mind manipulated by the leaders of "civilization," by fear and control. Now remove the fear and control, and imagine the power we would have to destroy the bonds of society and all of our so-called leaders.

All mass exterminations/genocides, all social programming and war, in all of mankind's history were the result of the manipulative power, and absolute power, of the the human mind. Think of a small scale example. Helter Skelter, Charles Manson. These words strike fear into the hearts of all who know of them. Yet as powerful as Mr. Manson's mind was he manipulated a few to kill a few. Our leaders manipulate millions to kill millions using the same force of the mind while we sleep in our mindless stupor.

We can each learn to control our own minds and use them as a weapon. Nature was wise in giving us this power, but we must realize this truth: Your mind is yours and yours alone. It is the last untamed frontier, the last unspoiled wilderness, the last place where freedom remains - this is the perfect design of nature. Learn to recognize the pathogens those in power place in your mind, and remember you are the antibiotic, you are the cure, you must free your mind and body from their shackles. Use your mind as a weapon and combat them. Then if forced by hand of violence use your mind and body to fight them. Fight them until they fall vanquished upon your undefeatable sword, your righteous mind.

Part Two 

Chapter Two

Reprogramming

When you find yourself experiencing hate or fear of any enemy, of anything, seen or unseen ask yourself this question: Where does this fear or hatred come from, and more importantly why do I fear or hate? If the answer remains dubious to you ask yourself if the thing should be hated or feared, or in the case of an enemy, ask yourself if the enemy really is your personal foe. Ask yourself who this enemy or thing really is and if you intrinsically fear or hate it, or if someone or something else manipulated you into feeling these emotions toward the thing/enemy. It could be that the thing itself is inevitable like death, or out of your control like life so not worth fearing or hating just experiencing in their given time. It could be the enemy was created for unimaginable profit like ISIS, Hodge, or the Vietcong. Fear and hate we have established are mechanisms of manipulation, and enemies are necessary for the general maintenance of any civilization. Those in power need them most of all to shift the focus off of themselves while keeping the masses distracted. It all goes back to John Nash and game theory sort of top down in reverse, but essentially the same.

They do not want us to focus on them so they shift our focus onto less destructive things and get us to do their great works of evil. In return we get the illusion of society, and they get power and exponential profit. Until it all defeats itself of course, as it always has. They tell you they will protect you from the enemy, yet they created the enemy, and never fight the enemy face to face as you and your children have done throughout all of "civilized" history. In light of that fact it always amazes me how quickly society is willing to accept a new enemy without question. They may have never even heard of said enemy, or be able to locate the enemies lands upon a map, but they embrace the enemy as an enemy so quickly. Astonishing really.

No one ever seems to be able to see the voice who created the problem as the problem. Those who created the enemy as the enemy. They follow the manipulative voices of apparent control or power never realizing it is that very tactic which gives them their power. Distraction, confusion, fear, hate, all pointed like the world's largest 1911 .45 caliber away from them. It is an illusion upon an illusion, supported by delusion. It will never end until we wake up in the mind.

My first grade teacher Mrs. Stockdale, used to say over thirty years ago, "put on your thinking caps," to which I respond, "take off the cap, then you can start thinking for yourself." That is what society does, it places a cap on how we must think and act. Under the apparently innocuous auspicious narrative of protecting us from ourselves they excuse the incarceration of our nature. We are left with a world in which we must come to see everything as potential manipulation, or distraction, in the form of false fear, or false hatred. All of this being debilitating to our nature and our mind.

You would not use a cloth to sharpen a sword for battle, therefore take care which tools you use to sharpen your mind. Otherwise those in power will be able to use your weapon better than you, and it is they who will own your will. They will know you better than you know yourself. Then you will have lost.

That is the methodology society implements to control us. They control the tools available to you for mind control, and as such they render your weapons useless unless they are under their control. Think of it like a kind of hypnotism of the masses. They tell you through all forms of media, social engineering, institutionalization, even military training exactly how much power and control you have. They tell you when and how you can use it. They use groupthink, psychological operations, and social engineering to essentially release certain traits in your human nature and control them at the same time. This is apparent in special operations military units for example. A soldier is given a high degree of training to instantly react under a given set of combat situations. The desire is that the soldier react exactly according to the training subconsciously while following all new orders as given. The soldier is allowed the option to adapt, but in most cases this results in the other side of our nature bleeding thru the programming. A soldier detonates all of his grenades for example, selflessly sacrificing himself for his comrades. This behavior was unplanned, unordered, uncontrolled and will usually be deemed heroism. Public reward will be given. Another soldier, for example, perhaps realizes that his/her enemy is not really a personal foe, but a fabricated one. Therefore the soldier refuses to fight. This behavior is unplanned, unordered, and uncontrolled and will usually be deemed cowardice. This soldier will receive a court-martial and prison or jail time. Public humiliation will follow.

Both cases are undesirable for those in control. Both represent a failure in programming. That is why such inflammatory language is used to describe each soldier. In the first example we are meant to be inflamed with pride when we hear of the unusual actions of the first soldier going above and beyond for his fellow soldiers. This programs us subconsciously into thinking heroism should be an unusual behavior, but when it randomly occurs we have to hold the person in very high esteem of course. The unsaid is that we all lack the capacity to be heroes, when the truth is far from that. The unsaid is that this person is different than everyone else and should be treated as such.

In the second example we are meant to be inflamed with hatred of the soldier who laid down his arms because if you are not with us you are, by default, against us. In this case it is essentially equally unfavorable for those in power. We as society see a different picture painted for us of a coward who failed his/her nation. Deep down we all know that it takes a kind of courage to stand against a war as a soldier because the consequences are basically so severe. Albeit a different kind of courage than the first example, the second soldier is giving up having much of any life after his/her action as well. They are accepting a pariah status, a scarlet letter for the rest of their lives. They are expected to be treated different from everyone else forever as well.

The point is that in both cases stepping outside of your programming is noted as unusual behavior. As such many of our heroes have had tragic ends themselves. Many of them became social outcasts because people don't like the "tall tulip," as they say "it gets clipped." Because people are jealous of them they lose friends. Often their status sets them aside from others and the weight is such that they end their own lives, or die because of drugs or alcoholism. Such as was the case with the Marine, and Pima American Indian Ira Hayes, who raised the flag at Iwo Jima only to die drunk in a ditch. A fate he shared with many other heroes and so-called cowards alike.

Your mind now is very much like a xerophytic plant growing in a great desert.  It is strong enough to survive the drought with little water. It can withstand great heat, and it can endure the burning sun. It stands strong in the fierce desert wind. The difference is that you, unlike the plant, can divert the water flow from the river of knowledge into your humble desert plot. You can turn what society has made a desert into an oasis. As Darius the First built the foundation stones of the Suez in the Persian Satraps south west in the "Abarnhara", the desert west of the Euphrates of ancient Persia, (now south west of Baghdad) so you can bring the refreshing waters of Egypt to your mind's eye. The choice is yours and yours alone.

Reprogramming begins with opening your mind and accepting that most of what you will see contains some degree of propaganda. You must learn, through reading books of all kinds, to recognize fact from fiction, truth from propaganda. You can do this by listening to the emotions various texts illicit in you, and questioning their validity. Then you must compare and contrast them with what you see going on today, and decide what facts are relevant and can be acted upon. It is not so important what you choose to read, but the fact that you begin choosing what goes into your mind instead of letting society choose for you. When it comes to history I suggest reading the large history tomes that no one reads which are full of relevant facts, as opposed to textbooks which generally are pontifications, conjecture, and opinion of those who have taken the time (perhaps) to read those texts and interpret them for the everyday person while under the thumb of the social programmers. It is a bit like when the Catholic church refused to allow its "believers" access to the Bible, but then told them what it said.

You don't have to learn how to decipher Old Persian, Akkadian, Elamite, or Aramaic cuneiform text and begin reading the Persepolis Tablets or other Persian reliefs. You just need to get as close as possible to primary source history. As close to truth as you can. From there you may find yourself reading Xenophon's Cyropaedia, Oeconomica, or Anabasis. You may read Herodotus 16 Nomos. You may read Ctesias. You never know where choosing your own path may lead in the mind. You may read further back into the time of Homer "The Iliad," and "The Odyssey." You may read Thomas Paine's "Age of Reason" 1794. You may find yourself reading "A People's History of the United States," by Howard Zinn. You may read "The Good War," or "Hard Times, by Studs Terkel. You may read "The Grapes of Wrath" By John Steinbeck, or "Fahrenheit 451," by Ray Bradbury. You may read "Slaughterhouse Five," By Kurt Vonnegut. You may read, "1984" or "Animal Farm," by George Orwell. Perhaps "The Gathering Storm," by Churchill, or "The Grand Design," by Hawking, Guerilla Warfare by Ché Guevara. Just choose and decipher. Find the truth, seek it out. Anything written or otherwise contains lessons for those with a mind that can filter out the lies. Put aside your programming, your conventional wisdoms and personal feelings, stop trying to align things with your confirmation bias. Think outside of your constructed paradigm of thought. Here you will begin to see the truth in all things. Separate the wheat from the chaff.

Part Two 

Chapter Three
Answers in Nature and All Around You

Outside of literature and film answers lay all around to the perplexing questions of life. One must not be afraid to look at things around often taken for granted. For example, find a place close by you where natural earth is at your feet. If possible reach down in front of you and take a handful of earth into your hand. Feel it, squeeze it, smell it, if pragmatic taste it. It is your past. It is you now. It is your future. It is your essence. Like the remnants of ancient celestial explosions, combined with the decayed or decaying remnants of millions of dead organisms, you and the earth in your hand are one in the same. Eventually you will be exactly in the same state of being as the "dirt" in your hand, and beneath your feet. Your mind must grasp this ever present, enduring truth: All mankind before has died, and so it will be for you and for me.

This may seem like a foregone conclusion. Yet which of you taking earth in your hand and seeing a worm within it, has really considered that in a state of nature you should die and be food for worms and all those we consider less than ourselves? Our brothers and sisters who sustain us in life, we are to sustain in death. Nature's perfect laws in action.

You can see truth in nature. Every biological organism is in a near constant state of combat. As a whole this protects our earthen biological evolution from unforeseen threats. If all things have a constant will to survive then the whole collective force of life has a better chance to survive. Each species, extinct in the past or thriving today, was another attempt at survival for the whole. Those who live on succeed as they live, sustain others as they die out, and eventually become a forgotten part of the earth. Yet the DNA they shared with the very first single celled organisms and all others still lives on. Brethren in life and in death. Tied together through time and space. All a part of not only the same beginning on earth, but a part of the same infinitely dense quantum particle that exploded creating the big bang.

The truth of life is how nature wants, and tries to force all things to live. Whether by some grand design or happenstance nature's perfect life is a life as a subject to perfect randomness, to indifference. Evolution requires this state to thrive. When nature is subjugated and controlled its lessons cannot be learned. Life cannot be lived. The mighty industrialists who created this civilization used this belief in natural law to justify their ruthless climb to the top. Then under the ruse of free market competition they pulled the ladders to the top up behind them, and spent the next one hundred years building an impenetrable glass ceiling. Underneath we are living not in any type of system like the one that spawned our leaders, but under serfdom. They select the winners and the losers from birth. They get rid of them at the whim of their design. We have no power like the force we as individuals had before the construction of this particular civilization or civilization in general for that matter. This illusion of freedom is just the new religion of this era. Men in power have always held us captive with grand lies, and false hopes. Before that they used primarily brute force, and still do whenever necessary. Using the tools we discussed earlier of fear and hatred as the machinery of their power they maintain control of our minds.

Part Two

Chapter Four 

Paradox

Ponder this. Society is doomed, but we still have to destroy it. Quite a paradox. The fact is that only by destroying society in a precise and willful manner can we hope to vindicate ourselves from it forever. Only by bringing it down as a species, over time, can we possibly prepare for life after civilization. It is the only way we have even a chance at saving our planet, for if we simply let the system fail, as all others have, we will be left with pure extinction. A living planet forced either into permanent darkness, or into a new beginning for biological evolution from microorganisms on foreword. 3.8 billion years of evolution at a near total restart due to our actions. We must dismantle any creation, and stop any activity, that could possibly cause this result. We cannot do anything else. We cannot build a way out onto another celestial body in time. We cannot shift our systems to sustainable technology in time. We cannot evolve in time. We must accept our history, our nature, and our inevitable fate. When we do this and act to bring down our system we may save ourselves. More importantly we have a moral responsibility to every organism on this planet for it is they that spawned us. They are our brothers and sisters, they are our parents, they are our children, they are our family. We must save them from our so-called civilization. They have sustained us throughout all of our history, and many would throw them under the bus just to survive. That is unacceptable. No species is worthy of a new planet if they cannot take care of their own. We are no exception. We could not survive without our fellow beasts or our ecosystems. We have only one planet and we must save it.

In our arrogance we see our entire earth as lesser than ourselves. All of its inhabitants as nothing more than savage beasts or less. Unthinking, unfeeling, unknowing. We take without regard, and only now have a few begun to see this lie exposed. This earth is not our possession. If anything the earth owns us, we are to be its subjects. Like all other living things, subject to nature and nature's laws. Our nature tells us if we can kill it, or control it, or dominate it it belongs to us. You see, we really are just like any other beast. That type of thinking only works if we live like beasts. On the societal, the macro level, that beast-like thinking will consume all, dominate all until nothing remains. We must move back to stop the destruction brought by civilization. Our nature is the root  problem with society, the broken part of our machine, but it cannot change in time. The machine however can be destroyed because it is the only beneficial choice. Our nature will choose to destroy civilization because all other choices are certain doom. Then perhaps in the sands of time we may evolve, but no matter. As long as we and, first and foremost, the earth's biological life survives success will have been achieved.

We are left with a choice that no so-called intelligent species would ever want to make. Nevertheless it is perfect logic. If you are on a path to self destruction as a species you must either change your nature or your system. Seeing as how our nature dictates our systems, we must destroy our systems. Then we will be left with our nature and the system that our nature evolved out of, and lived in harmony with for 290,000 years or more. Mutually certain survival statistically speaking. We have every reason to believe we will survive in the system that we lived in successfully for an eternity next to our brief time of civilization. No matter how hard it is, we will survive as a species. Our planet, most essentially, will survive as well. The science is in favor of those numbers. So it is that path, or a path that science and history dictate will destroy us, that we have to choose from. No choice really, only an imperative to act!

Part Two 

Chapter Five
Vision

The reality is a few of us have the capacity to save the planet, civilization, and ourselves within us. We are those who failed the societal institutionalization process, and yet maintain control of our minds. We are those also who work within the system, and yet internally we reject it, undermine it, whenever possible. Secondly we possess vision, higher moral thinking capacity, and generally we are more evolved in our nature. However the nature of the whole of humanity is such, especially the leadership, that we are left powerless. So let me spend sometime describing to you some examples of vision, and a civilized world that could, hypothetically, function without destroying earth or ourselves in brief if only it were possible.

First we would have to begin to build upon a "Green New Deal." We would re-instill the "three C's" the Civilian Conservation Corps creating possibly a million new jobs. We would build massive hexagonal buildings a square acre in width or two, a thousand feet in height. Around each structure would be a solar array, manually maintained and operated on each floor just outside of the windows, which would go around the entire structure. At the top of each behemoth would be a solar power array of one to two acres in size. Directly in the center a massive wind turbine would churn even more power every hour. If in a desert environment the primary water source for each structure would be a direct drill into an aquifer below. Rain water harvesting systems would exist for times of desert deluge. In rainy climates rain water harvesting would prevail with deep wells drilled for times of drought. Within each structure would be a ceiling of growing lights bringing light to one to two acres of organic vegetables and fruits per floor. Clean room level conditions maintained would ensure no insecticides, fungicides, or mold inhibitors would ever be needed as would the existence of indoor growing in general. Floor after floor for a thousand feet up. One to two hundred acres of fresh organic food, sustainably grown, on as little as one to two acres of land. Thousands of acres of food on twenty acres of land. On an approximate thousand acre former monoculture farm we could grow nearly 100,000 acres worth of clean, sustainable food. We could generate untold amounts of reserve energy. We could feed our nation with vegetables from what used to be one single agro-giant farm. The food would be infinitely diverse, and cleaner than anything in a supermarket today. We could construct this project when started in less than ten years.

At the same time we must build a nationwide interconnected light rail system. The system would run through every state capital, major city, and state in the lower 48 of the United States. East to West, North to South, and everywhere between. Fueling this system, and would eventually our nation, would be a desert southwest dominated not by sage brush and dust, but by endless millions of acres of solar array and wind-farm. Then overtime expanding eastward the new power source plugged into existing infrastructure would eventually replacing coal. We would create new long-term jobs to replace the old ones maintaining the near endless solar panels and wind turbines, light-rail, and existing and refurbished power grid. The "lineman" will still work to keep up the grid. Only the source of power will change, gradually. Within a few decades we could replace our energy by eighty percent with solar and wind. We need a new industrial revolution fueled by naturally sourced power: human power, the wind, and the sun. With the old grid being used the phasing out of fossil fuels for electricity would come with little problem.

Citizens of America need not loose their cars, homes, or newly given freedoms of First World technology either. We must create a new "Green" Model-T and get the Big Three to bid for it. An electric car, or hybrid that everyone can afford, and if not we can give them a government grant to buy it according to their income. Homes would be plugged into a sustainable grid, but in order to get this done we would have to remove the men with no vision from power. We would have to change the nature of the millions living in fear. We would have to change our nature. So since that level of evolution cannot happen this vision cannot become a reality now nor any other. Since our political system is systemically corrupted, these goals must wait. We will have to remove this system to save our planet. Unless of course tomorrow a miracle happens, and men of vision are given the reigns of power by the arrogant, unfit, power-mongers. This reality cannot be achieved. The answer remains clear, what should happen is of no consequence, nor what could happen, but what must happen. The end of the disease of civilization until our nature can evolve to accept vision and living as one with the earth.

Part Two

Chapter Six
Division

Nation. Race. Religion. Culture. State. Province. City. County. North. South. East. West. Age. Sexual Orientation. Economic Status. Criminal Record. These things, and infinitely more, represent division created not just to identify us as individuals, but to set in the minds of our fellow humans subtle differences from one another in order to foster a separation of our common race. The human race. We are all humans, caught up from birth, in a war against ourselves and our fellow man. A war against the earth. A war that is perpetuated by the men in power. We have gravitated to it naturally do to the fact that we have been programmed to think in these biased ways.

Therefore we cannot see, we dare not see, good in our fellow man. If we did lay down our guard for even that moment, we may find his knife at our throat. He says the same to himself. As such we remain divided. The men in power build up these differences amongst us, and at times go as far as to unite several of us under some common cause or larger group, so they can fight us against ourselves and/or other people. They dehumanize the "enemy" to create division. Unfortunately, in pragmatic terms the enemy in this situation is at its heart, our easily manipulated nature. We have hate because we are being enslaved, so our master turns us like rabid dogs upon his rival kings and lords. He re-directs our hatred away from himself. This is to say that those in power are using the natural revolutionary spirit, the free spirit of men in chains filled with rage, against their own fellow men in bondage. Serf against Serf, Slave against Slave. Never Slave against Boyer, or Serf against Lord. Always men of no means eating other men of no means. The Kings laugh looking on as they have for all of "civilized" history.

There is a universal division as long as society remains however. The men of power, the kings and the men beneath them, the slaves. We are forever divided from them. The kings are slaves as well. They are slaves to power, and wealth. Losing these things would expose them for the weak and feeble beasts they are. Hiding behind a paper veil, and using it to create power using men who they, themselves, despise. These men are our brethren chomping at the bit, thirsting for escape, but living in fear. They march on to do the bidding of their rulers. Fear drives them, yet following the king risks their lives perhaps the same as turning their own swords upon him. The king cares nothing for whether or not a servant dies doing his bidding, or a hundred servants, or a million servants. He can always manufacture more. He always has more standing ready, snarling at the gates of his infinite cages, ready to strike at anything when the "freedom" bell tolls and the door is unlocked. Yet the beasts never ask who unlocked the cage, and who is it, after the battle, who beckons them back into stock and iron? They are so hungry for expression, for freedom, that they tear limb from limb of their own brethren, then drunk on their blood, they go back to sleep and the door is slammed shut upon them until the next time... and the next... and the next... never ending. Never ending is the thirst and hunger of kings and the misplaced rage of the masses. 

Epilogue

So what are we left with then? The necessity of dissent, within the epoch of ignorance. We must dissent, we must fight, we must bring down our institutions, before we become no more. Upon the greatest beach of an infinite ocean, our universe, the free mind of all of mankind exists as a single grain of sand. It was meant to endure under the crashing waves and evolve. To go on for as long as time and chance allow, and it becomes once again apart of the infinite ocean that is our Universe. Unlock the doors of your perception, see the truth, and act.

For every rose grows to bloom and then to fade in its time. All things are in a state of continual birth, growth, life, and death. Within this we find ourselves in our time. A thing I believe, based on my own life's knowledge and experience to be non-linear. I believe all points in time are connected and perhaps even traversable. What is certain is that the written word is an active means of transcending time. A thousand years hence a person may be reading this very text experiencing a ghost of who I am now. Hopefully they will be looking back upon our world with wonder that we could survive in our ignorance. Hopefully they and I will connect on that transcendental plane of the human mind. There at least a part of me will forever be united in the cause for a better world with all others of substance in the human species and any other in the universe.

Life in a state of nature is indifference pure. Life in any system created by man is unfairness pure. The choice between one or the other is relegated to the choice between a chance to fight and win, and the hopelessness of becoming a chosen one amongst the sea of billions of living dead. Even if one achieved that lofty place it would be a meaningless life endured at the expense of every living being on the face of the earth.